SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. M. Reeves

Last decided New York VarickSep 2022
Decisions 1,517since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating an approval rate requires looking at the broader context of the hearing office. The 73% approval rate for M. Reeves is based on 1,517 decisions on record since 2016, which compares to the 48% to 85% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different benches operate.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 73%
Decisions on record 1,517

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Reeves. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Reeves's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Reeves
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for M. Reeves fluctuated between January 2016 and September 2022. After starting with 82% approval in 2016 and 84% in 2017, the record shows 59% in 2018, 66% in 2019, 59% in 2020, 83% in 2021, and 88% in 2022. With 1,517 total decisions on record, these shifts highlight the importance of case-specific evidence.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Reeves's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York Varick hearing office

The New York Varick hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region. As of the most recent record in September 2022, this office maintained a bench of 10 judges. You can expect a standard administrative process where the quality of medical evidence remains the primary factor in a decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick

Social Security Administration cases are assigned through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick, with approval rates ranging from 48% to 85% on their since-2016 records. These statistics provide insight into the office's bench.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions