SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kimberly L. Schiro

Last decided BronxJul 2026
Decisions 2,066since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes. While you see a 62% approval rate across 2,066 decisions since 2016, recent performance shows a 78% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest figure stands 23 points above the Bronx office average of 55%. These statistics provide a baseline for understanding the history of the bench, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 2,066
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Schiro Bronx National
Approval rate 78% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 73% — —
Denials 22% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Schiro's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Schiro
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Kimberly L. Schiro shows a shift over the data window starting in 2016. After maintaining a steady approval rate through the late 2010s, the data indicates an upward trend in recent years. While the rate averaged 62% over the full period, the latest reporting period shows a 78% approval rate, reflecting a continuation of the higher approval patterns observed since 2023.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Schiro's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Bronx hearing office

The Bronx hearing office maintains a bench of 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 55%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical evidence provided in your file. You can see the Bronx Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Bronx

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Bronx. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, from 43% to 84% on their records since 2016. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions