SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stewart Stallings

Last decided SpokaneJul 2026
Decisions 3,439since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Stewart Stallings are based on 3,439 decisions recorded since 2016. When evaluating these figures, it is helpful to compare them against the 48% to 78% range seen among other judges whose most recent office on record is Spokane. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's approval rate of 72% sits above the office, state, and national benchmarks. These aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 3,439
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stallings Spokane National
Approval rate 72% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 61% — —
Denials 28% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stallings's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stallings
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Stewart Stallings has shown variance since 2016. After a period of decline reaching a low in 2022, the data shows an upward trend in recent years, with the latest period reflecting a continuation of this pattern. These shifts often correlate with changes in case mix or the quality of evidence presented. The recent figures suggest a higher rate of favorable outcomes compared to the long-term average on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stallings's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Spokane hearing office

Stewart Stallings's most recent office on record is the Spokane hearing office, with data through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 7 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 69%, providing a local benchmark for your hearing.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Spokane

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is Spokane, and 4 of them decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 48% to 78% on their records since 2016. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions