SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Margaret M. Sullivan

Last decided TacomaJul 2026
Decisions 3,638since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2016 is 74%, recent performance shows a 94% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 36 points above the office average of 58%. These statistics are based on a significant docket of 3,638 decisions on record since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 74%
Decisions on record 3,638
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Sullivan Tacoma National
Approval rate 94% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 89% — —
Denials 6% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Sullivan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Sullivan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Margaret M. Sullivan has shown an upward trajectory since 2016. After a period of fluctuation between 2018 and 2019, the approval rate began a consistent climb, reaching 93% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This latest-period performance represents a divergence from the 74% average observed over the full decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Sullivan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tacoma hearing office

Margaret M. Sullivan's most recent office on record is the Tacoma hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the Washington region and maintains a bench of 17 judges. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 58%, you can expect a review of your medical evidence and vocational history.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tacoma

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 4 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file. Approval rates among this bench range from 30% to 78% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions