SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Susan Toth

Last decided WichitaJul 2026
Decisions 3,116since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The table below displays Susan Toth's 37% SSDI approval rate on record since 2016 against the range of 37% to 67% seen among other judges whose most recent office on record is the Wichita Hearing Office. We also provide the latest-period figures to show how recent trends compare to the office, state, and national averages. These 3,116 decisions on record provide the statistical foundation for these comparisons.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 37%
Decisions on record 3,116
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Toth Wichita National
Approval rate 28% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 13% — —
Denials 72% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Toth's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Toth
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since November 2016, your approval rate for Susan Toth has fluctuated. After reaching a low of 27% in 2021, the rate climbed to 48% in 2024 before settling at 28% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 3,116 total decisions on record, this pattern highlights how approval rates can shift over time. The latest period reflects a departure from the mid-range averages seen in recent years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Toth's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Wichita hearing office

Susan Toth's most recent office on record is the Wichita Hearing Office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you if you are in the region and operates as part of the broader SSA network. With 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains a consistent volume of hearings. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Wichita

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench range from 37% to 67% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions