SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lauren K. Tran

Last decided Topeka KSJul 2026
Decisions 1,272since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Lauren K. Tran's 44% approval rate on record since 2023 reflects a broad history of decisions, while the latest-period data offers a snapshot of recent trends. Within the Topeka KS office, peer judges show a wide range of approval outcomes, from 24% to 60% on their records. These figures provide context for the local bench, but aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 1,272
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Tran Topeka KS National
Approval rate 39% 44% 58%
Fully favorable 20% — —
Denials 61% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tran's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tran
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since February 2023, Lauren K. Tran has issued 1,272 decisions. The yearly trend shows an approval rate of 49% in 2023 and 45% in 2024, followed by 45% in 2025 and 39% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent shift indicates a divergence from the historical average. Such patterns often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence you present, though the latest period reflects a departure from previous stability.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tran's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Topeka KS hearing office

Lauren K. Tran's most recent office on record is the Topeka KS hearing office, which serves you across Kansas. This office maintains a bench of 9 judges who handle a diverse range of disability claims. You can expect a standard administrative process governed by federal regulations. You can see the Topeka KS Hearing Office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Topeka KS

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Topeka KS hearing office, with 4 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file through July 2026. Approval rates among these peers vary significantly, ranging from 24% to 60% on their records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions