Laura Valente's most recent SSA record (September 2025) is at the Seattle hearing office. Across the 2,898 decisions on record since 2016, 53% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 21% to 93% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your specific hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Laura Valente's 53% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the broader range of 21% to 93% seen among the 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle. This data provides a statistical baseline for understanding how different benches approach disability claims.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Valente. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Valente's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval trend for Laura Valente has fluctuated across the 2,898 decisions on record since 2016. After reaching a peak of 65% in 2021, the approval rate moved toward 51% in 2025. This pattern shows that decision-making has shifted over time, which may reflect changes in case mix or the quality of evidence presented in recent hearings.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Valente's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Seattle hearing office
Laura Valente's most recent office on record is the Seattle hearing office, with decisions there through September 2025. This office serves you and other claimants across Washington and the surrounding region, maintaining a bench of 22 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation is the primary factor in a decision.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle, with approval rates ranging from 21% to 93% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the local bench is a standard part of your hearing preparation.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Laura Valente's 53% approval rate since 2016 falls within the 21% to 93% range observed among the 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle. Because case assignment is random, an attorney can help you prepare for the specific evidentiary standards often seen in this office.
Yes, the approval rate has varied over the 2,898 decisions on record. While the rate reached 65% in 2021, it has since adjusted to 51% in 2025. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to the current requirements for your specific disability claim.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, which ensures that assignments remain random and impartial. An attorney can help you prepare your case regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and testimony to determine if you meet the criteria for disability. Because the process is complex, an attorney can help you organize your evidence and prepare for the questions the judge may ask.
An approval rate is a probability cloud based on past decisions, not a guarantee of how Laura Valente will rule on your specific case. Your outcome depends heavily on the medical evidence and vocational testimony you provide. An attorney can help you strengthen your case to ensure you meet the necessary legal standards.




