SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Laura Valente

Last decided SeattleSep 2025
Decisions 2,898since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Laura Valente's 53% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the broader range of 21% to 93% seen among the 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle. This data provides a statistical baseline for understanding how different benches approach disability claims.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 2,898

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Valente. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Valente's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Valente
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Laura Valente has fluctuated across the 2,898 decisions on record since 2016. After reaching a peak of 65% in 2021, the approval rate moved toward 51% in 2025. This pattern shows that decision-making has shifted over time, which may reflect changes in case mix or the quality of evidence presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Valente's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seattle hearing office

Laura Valente's most recent office on record is the Seattle hearing office, with decisions there through September 2025. This office serves you and other claimants across Washington and the surrounding region, maintaining a bench of 22 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation is the primary factor in a decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle, with approval rates ranging from 21% to 93% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the local bench is a standard part of your hearing preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions