SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Andrew Verne

Last decided San DiegoJul 2026
Decisions 3,595since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Andrew Verne's 38% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a baseline, while the latest-period approval rate of 41% offers a view into more recent activity. These figures are best understood against the broader bench in San Diego, where individual judge approval rates range from 37% to 68% since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 3,595
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Verne San Diego National
Approval rate 41% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 34% — —
Denials 59% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Verne's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Verne
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate has fluctuated. After a period of decline between 2019 and 2021, the rate saw an increase in 2022 before stabilizing. The latest period shows an approval rate of 41%, which is higher than the overall average on record. This recent activity reflects a pattern where decisions remain sensitive to the specific evidence presented in each case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Verne's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Diego hearing office

Andrew Verne's most recent office on record is the San Diego hearing office, which serves claimants across Southern California. This office is home to 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 58%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence. You can see the San Diego Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Diego

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Diego office, and 5 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 68% since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions