SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Angel X. Viera

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 846 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Angel X. Viera is calculated from 846 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2020. This figure provides a baseline for understanding how the judge has historically ruled compared to the San Juan hearing office's broader bench, which features a lifetime approval-rate range of 62% to 88%. These statistics rely on a significant volume of cases to ensure the data reflects a stable pattern. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 846

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Viera. The most recent period with decisions on record is January 31, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Viera's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Viera
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision record for Angel X. Viera shows a consistent pattern over the period from 2016 to 2020. After an initial year with a limited sample, the approval rate stabilized near the 62% mark for several years before seeing a rise to 70% in the final year of the record. This trend indicates that the judge's approach to evidence and testimony has remained relatively steady throughout the observed window. The recent shift in the final year may reflect changes in the volume or nature of the cases assigned to the docket.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Viera's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Juan hearing office

The San Juan hearing office serves you throughout Puerto Rico. The office maintains a diverse bench of 11 judges who handle a wide variety of disability claims. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the San Juan hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 7 currently reporting in the latest period. Approval rates among these peers vary significantly, ranging from 62% to 88% on a lifetime basis. You can review the office's full roster on the San Juan hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions