SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Katherine Weatherly

Last decided EugeneJul 2026
Decisions 3,976since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at consistent data windows. You can compare Katherine Weatherly's 57% approval rate on record since 2016 against the 32% to 81% range observed among the bench at the Eugene hearing office. Latest-period metrics show the judge's approval rate at 58%, which aligns with the office-wide latest-period average. These figures provide a statistical baseline derived from thousands of decisions.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 3,976
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Weatherly Eugene National
Approval rate 58% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 51% — —
Denials 42% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Weatherly's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Weatherly
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, the judge has issued 3,976 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuations, moving from 48% in 2016 to a peak of 64% in 2020, before reaching 59% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This pattern reflects a consistent approach to evidence evaluation over time. The latest period shows no significant deviation from the long-term average on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Weatherly's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Eugene hearing office

Katherine Weatherly's most recent office on record is the Eugene hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 58%, providing a benchmark for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Eugene

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 81% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions