SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John M. Wood

Last decided PeoriaJul 2026
Decisions 3,917since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes. The 42% approval rate for John M. Wood since 2016 provides a long-term view, while the latest-period data allows for a direct comparison against the Peoria office, state, and national benchmarks. With 3,917 decisions on record, the data provides a look at past outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 3,917
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Wood Peoria National
Approval rate 38% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 33% — —
Denials 62% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wood's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wood
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for John M. Wood has fluctuated since 2016. After a peak in 2017 and 2018, the rate saw a decline in 2022 before showing signs of recovery in 2024 and 2025. The latest period shows a 38% approval rate, which is lower than the long-term average on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wood's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Peoria hearing office

John M. Wood's most recent office on record is the Peoria hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 8 judges with varying approval patterns. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 58%, providing a baseline for the region. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Peoria

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assigned judge is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates for this bench range from 32% to 68% based on records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions