SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sarah Zimmerman

Last decided Portland MESep 2023
Decisions 1,452since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Sarah Zimmerman is 38% based on 1,452 decisions since 2016. This figure sits within the 38% to 85% range observed among the 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Portland ME hearing office. Comparing these rates helps you understand the historical context of your hearing, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 1,452

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Zimmerman. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Zimmerman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Zimmerman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Sarah Zimmerman has maintained a varied approval pattern. After an initial period of fluctuation, the data shows a shift in 2021, followed by a stabilization in recent years. With 1,452 total decisions on record, the volume provides a clear view of how case outcomes have evolved. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, suggesting that the approach to evidence and testimony has remained consistent in recent years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Zimmerman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Portland ME hearing office

The Portland ME hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout Maine and the surrounding region. It is supported by a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your decision. To learn more about the local bench, see the Portland ME Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Portland ME

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Portland ME hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 38% to 85% on their records since 2016. While the specific judge matters, the core requirements for proving your disability remain the same.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions