Amputations at Work — Injury Statistics and Claims Information

Injured at work? See what benefits you may be owed.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

Amputations at Work

Severe amputation incidents are slowly decreasing

OSHA has documented 27,837 severe amputation cases over the last decade, with the vast majority of these injuries impacting the fingers. These incidents often occur in high-speed industrial environments where precision and safety protocols are paramount.

The loss of a digit or limb creates immediate functional limitations that often persist for a lifetime. Beyond the initial trauma, workers frequently face long-term challenges with grip strength, fine motor skills, and the ability to perform essential job duties.

Reported Projected
01k2k3k4k20152026
Data: Federal OSHA Severe Injury Reports (29 states). 2025 and 2026 data forecasted by ClaimsBoost research team.

What's Driving the Trend?

While the 10-year trend shows a 13.7 percent decrease in reported amputations, the annual volume remains high. Persistent safety gaps in machine guarding and lockout procedures continue to drive thousands of preventable injuries every year.

Manufacturing remains the primary industry for these injuries, accounting for 55.1 percent of all severe cases. The reliance on heavy machinery like conveyors, saws, and molding equipment creates a constant risk of entanglement for workers in this sector.

How Amputations Happen at Work

Top causes based on OSHA incident reports

The most common cause of workplace amputations is becoming caught or entangled in running powered equipment, which accounts for 41.9 percent of all reported incidents. Workers are often injured during normal operation, maintenance, or cleaning when machines lack adequate safety barriers or emergency stop mechanisms.

1 Caught, entangled in running powered equipment— normal operation
Incidents
11,224
Share
47% of reported incidents
2 Compressed between running equipment and other object(s)
Incidents
3,896
Share
16% of reported incidents
3 Struck by rolling, sliding, or shifting objects—non-running
Incidents
2,130
Share
9% of reported incidents
4 Struck by running powered equipment— unspecified
Incidents
1,762
Share
7% of reported incidents
5 Struck by falling object
Incidents
1,594
Share
7% of reported incidents
6 Injured by object handled by person
Incidents
1,340
Share
6% of reported incidents
7 Struck by running powered equipment— during maintenance, cleaning, testing
Incidents
1,002
Share
4% of reported incidents
8 Struck by suspended or swinging object
Incidents
719
Share
3% of reported incidents
Cause Incidents Share
1Caught, entangled in running powered equipment— normal operation 11,22447% of reported incidents
2Compressed between running equipment and other object(s) 3,89616% of reported incidents
3Struck by rolling, sliding, or shifting objects—non-running 2,1309% of reported incidents
4Struck by running powered equipment— unspecified 1,7627% of reported incidents
5Struck by falling object 1,5947% of reported incidents
6Injured by object handled by person 1,3406% of reported incidents
7Struck by running powered equipment— during maintenance, cleaning, testing 1,0024% of reported incidents
8Struck by suspended or swinging object 7193% of reported incidents

Why This Matters for Your Case

Employers are strictly required to follow 29 CFR 1910.212, which mandates machine guarding to protect operators from hazards like point-of-operation contact. Furthermore, 29 CFR 1910.147, the control of hazardous energy standard, requires lockout or tagout procedures to ensure equipment is fully de-energized before maintenance begins.

Industries with Most Amputations

Where these injuries occur most frequently

Manufacturing leads all sectors with 55.1 percent of severe amputation cases, followed by construction at 10.5 percent. These industries rely heavily on stationary sawing, extruding, and conveyor machinery that can cause catastrophic injury in a fraction of a second if safety protocols fail.

Manufacturing 55%
Construction 10%
Wholesale Trade 6%
Retail Trade 5%
Transportation & Warehousing 5%
Other 19%

High-Risk Industries and Your Rights

Employers in these high-risk industries must comply with 29 CFR 1910.217 for mechanical power presses and 29 CFR 1926.300 for hand and power tools. These regulations serve as the baseline for protecting workers from moving parts, and failure to implement these standards often constitutes a direct violation of federal safety law.

Real Incident Reports

From actual OSHA investigation files

The incident reports reveal a recurring pattern where workers are injured while performing routine tasks like clearing jams, changing dies, or operating wood splitters. These narratives consistently highlight how kinetic energy release and unexpected machine activation turn standard operations into life-changing events.

Common Questions About Amputations Claims

About This Data
Source OSHA
Coverage 2015-2026
Updated April 2026
Author ClaimsBoost Research

The ClaimsBoost Research Team aggregates official government data to help workers understand workplace injury trends and their coverage options.

ClaimsBoost is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. ClaimsBoost is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any government agency. Performance scores, rankings, and statistics displayed on this site are calculated by ClaimsBoost using publicly available government data from OSHA severe injury reports. Individual results may vary. Nothing on this site should be construed as legal advice or a guarantee of benefits. If you need legal help, we can connect you with licensed attorneys in your area.Some written content on this page was created with the assistance of AI to help interpret and explain the data. AI can make mistakes — all content has been reviewed for accuracy, but we encourage you to verify any information that is important to your situation.