SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Rebecca Adams

Last decided Fayetteville NCSep 2025
Decisions 3,098since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. The 57% approval rate for Rebecca Adams reflects her entire record since 2016, which we compare against the 35% to 78% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC. This docket of 3,098 decisions provides a view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 3,098

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Adams. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Adams's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Adams
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Rebecca Adams has shifted since 2016. After starting with higher approval rates in 2017 and 2018, the data shows a decline followed by a period of relative stability between 2020 and 2024, where rates hovered between 35% and 46%. The most recent data from 2025 shows an uptick to 54%. This pattern reflects the complexity of the cases heard and the evolution of evidence standards over the last several years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Adams's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fayetteville NC hearing office

Rebecca Adams's most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC, with activity through September 2025. This office serves claimants in North Carolina and operates as part of the broader SSA hearing network. With a bench of 7 judges, the office handles a diverse range of claims requiring thorough medical documentation. You can see the Fayetteville NC Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC, and their approval rates range from 35% to 78%. While this variance exists, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent. You can find the full roster of judges on the Fayetteville NC hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions