SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gloria W. Green

Last decided FlorenceSep 2025
Decisions 3,521since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 73% approval rate for Gloria W. Green reflects her total decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 32% to 76% range of her peers at the Florence office. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges have historically approached disability claims.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 73%
Decisions on record 3,521

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Green. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Green's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Green
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Gloria W. Green has shown a consistent upward trend since 2016. Starting at 62% in 2016, the rate climbed over the years, reaching 91% in 2024 before settling at 83% in 2025. With 3,521 total decisions on record, this pattern suggests a shift in outcomes over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Green's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Florence hearing office

The Florence hearing office serves you across northern Alabama and surrounding areas. It is associated with a bench of 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, reflecting a diverse range of decision patterns. Individual outcomes depend heavily on the specific evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Florence

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 76% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions