SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Vanessa Lucas

Last decided Fayetteville NCJul 2026
Decisions 4,000since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table compares your judge's approval rate against the broader bench at the Fayetteville NC hearing office. By looking at the 4,000 decisions on record since 2016, you can see how this performance aligns with the office-wide range of 35% to 78%. Latest-period data also shows how your judge compares to the office, state, and national averages. These figures reflect past decisions rather than future outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 4,000
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lucas Fayetteville NC National
Approval rate 68% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 62% — —
Denials 32% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lucas's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lucas
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge has issued 4,000 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuation, with approval rates moving between a low of 59% in 2019 and a high of 74% in 2021. The most recent fiscal year to date shows a 69% approval rate, which remains consistent with the long-term average. This pattern reflects a stable approach to case evaluation over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lucas's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fayetteville NC hearing office

Vanessa Lucas's most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across North Carolina and is staffed by a bench of 7 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 65%, providing a local benchmark for understanding how cases are processed in this region. You can view the Fayetteville NC Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fayetteville NC

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 4 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates among this bench vary, ranging from 35% to 78% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions