SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Janet Akers

Last decided Orland ParkJul 2026
Decisions 1,953since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period. While you see a 33% approval rate across her entire record since 2017, her latest-period approval rate of 23% sits below the Orland Park office's latest-period rate of 43%. These figures are derived from 1,953 decisions on record, providing a view of past activity.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 33%
Decisions on record 1,953
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Akers Orland Park National
Approval rate 23% 43% 58%
Fully favorable 14% — —
Denials 77% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Akers's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Akers
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2017, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated. After a period of growth peaking at 48% in 2024, the rate shifted to 31% in 2025 and 23% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent decline represents a divergence from the historical average on record, reflecting a shift in outcomes that may be influenced by changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Akers's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orland Park hearing office

The Orland Park Hearing Office serves claimants across Illinois and the surrounding region. With 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains a diverse bench with varying approval patterns. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 43%, which provides context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orland Park

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orland Park office. Approval rates among these peers range from 25% to 69% on their respective records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions