SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gregory Smith

Last decided Orland ParkJul 2026
Decisions 4,237since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes. While your judge has a 62% approval rate across all decisions on record since 2016, recent performance is measured against the latest reporting period. In the latest period, your judge's 59% approval rate compares to the 43% office rate, 54% state rate, and 58% national rate. These figures provide a baseline for analysis, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 4,237
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Smith Orland Park National
Approval rate 59% 43% 58%
Fully favorable 47% — —
Denials 41% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Smith's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Smith
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since May 2016, the approval rate for your judge has shown yearly fluctuations. After an initial 60% rate in 2016, the annual figures have ranged from a low of 58% to a high of 70% in 2023. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 59% approval rate, which is in line with the long-term average. This pattern suggests a stable approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Smith's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orland Park hearing office

The Orland Park hearing office is the most recent office on record for your judge, with activity documented through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the Illinois region and maintains a bench of 9 judges. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 43%, you should ensure your documentation is thorough. You can see the Orland Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orland Park

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orland Park office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 25% to 69% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions