SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kevin T. Alexander

Last decided Little RockJul 2026
Decisions 3,895since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's approval rate on record since 2016 is 36%, this sits within a broader range of 27% to 66% for the bench at the Little Rock office. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's approval rate was 17%, compared to 43% for the office, 47% for the state, and 58% nationally. These figures are based on 3,895 decisions on record since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 36%
Decisions on record 3,895
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Alexander Little Rock National
Approval rate 17% 43% 58%
Fully favorable 15% — —
Denials 83% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Alexander's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Alexander
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Kevin T. Alexander has fluctuated since 2016. With 3,895 decisions on record, the judge has maintained a consistent volume of work over the years. The latest period reflects a departure from the historical average, which may be influenced by changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Alexander's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Little Rock hearing office

Kevin T. Alexander's most recent office on record is the Little Rock Hearing Office, which serves you across Arkansas. This office is part of a regional network that handles a high volume of disability claims. With 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 43%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Little Rock

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Little Rock office, and 8 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file (July 2026). Approval rates among this group vary significantly, ranging from 27% to 66% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions