SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michelle I. Allen

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,232 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your claim, it is helpful to look at how Judge Allen compares to the broader bench. The Long Island hearing office features a diverse range of judges with lifetime approval rates spanning from 48% to 83%. In the most recent reporting period, Judge Allen maintained a 73% approval rate, which is 2 points higher than the office average and 15 points higher than the national average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 2,232
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Allen Long Island National
Approval rate 73% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 62%
Denials 27%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Allen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Allen
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Allen has presided over 2,232 decisions, providing a stable data set to observe her decision-making patterns. Her yearly trend shows a period of fluctuation, including a lower approval rate in 2021, followed by a consistent recovery and rise in recent years. The latest reporting period reflects a continuation of this upward trend, with her current approval rate of 73% remaining steady compared to the previous year. This pattern suggests a judge whose recent approach has been more favorable to claimants than her historical average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Allen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

The Long Island hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, operating as a critical hub for New York disability benefits. This office maintains a bench of experienced jurists who handle a high volume of cases, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 71%. You can expect a formal proceeding where medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized. You can see the Long Island Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported data in the latest period. With a wide range of approval rates across the office, it is important to focus on the strength of your evidence regardless of who is assigned. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions