SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michelle I. Allen

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Long Island Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 12,409 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Allen?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Allen has presided over 12,409 lifetime decisions during her 10-year tenure. Her latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 73%, which compares to the Long Island office average of 75% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided in this courtroom over time. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Allen Long Island National
Approval rate 64% 75% 58%
Fully favorable 64%
Denials 27%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Allen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Allen
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over the last decade, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated. After a period of lower rates around 2021 and 2022, the data indicates a rise in favorable outcomes through 2025. The current 73% approval rate reflects a continuation of this trajectory, signaling a period of increased allowance activity compared to earlier years on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Allen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Allen? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

The Long Island Hearing Office manages a high volume of SSDI cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 75%, reflecting the local administrative environment. You can expect a rigorous review process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Long Island Hearing Office page for more information.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Long Island office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 61% to 81%. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent across all courtrooms.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions