Michelle I. Allen is an ALJ at the Long Island Hearing Office. Over 10 years on the bench, she has maintained a 64% lifetime approval rate across 12,409 lifetime decisions. While her latest approval rate of 73% sits above the national average of 58%, aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Allen has presided over 12,409 lifetime decisions during her 10-year tenure. Her latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 73%, which compares to the Long Island office average of 75% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided in this courtroom over time. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Allen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over the last decade, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated. After a period of lower rates around 2021 and 2022, the data indicates a rise in favorable outcomes through 2025. The current 73% approval rate reflects a continuation of this trajectory, signaling a period of increased allowance activity compared to earlier years on the bench.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Allen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Allen? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Long Island hearing office
The Long Island Hearing Office manages a high volume of SSDI cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 75%, reflecting the local administrative environment. You can expect a rigorous review process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Long Island Hearing Office page for more information.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Long Island office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 61% to 81%. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent across all courtrooms.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
