SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brian J. Crawley

On record 3,569 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for this judge are calculated based on a significant volume of cases, providing a clear view of historical decision patterns. When evaluating these figures, it is helpful to compare them against the broader range of 48% to 83% seen across the Long Island bench. This context helps you understand how individual judicial approaches vary within the same office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 80%
Decisions on record 3,569

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Crawley. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Crawley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Crawley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval record for Brian J. Crawley has shown fluctuations, moving from an 87% approval rate in 2016 to 67% in 2020. Following this period, the trend has shifted back upward, reaching 87% in 2025. These shifts are common and often relate to changes in the complexity of cases or the evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Crawley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

The Long Island hearing office serves claimants throughout the region and maintains a bench of 12 judges on record. Claimants appearing here can expect a formal process where the quality of medical evidence remains the primary factor in any decision. The office currently operates with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 71%.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom are reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 48% to 83%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions