Christopher Ambrose's most recent office on record is the Lansing hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 3,854 decisions on record since 2016, 68% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 37% to 68% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rates for Christopher Ambrose reflect a significant volume of work, with 3,854 decisions on record since 2016. When comparing his latest-period approval rate of 83% against the Lansing office's latest-period rate of 53%, he is 30 percentage points higher. These figures provide a snapshot of his recent decision-making activity compared to his peers. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ambrose's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, Christopher Ambrose has maintained a varied approval pattern across 3,854 decisions. After a period of fluctuation between 2020 and 2023, the data shows an upward trend in approvals starting in 2024. The latest reporting period shows an 83% approval rate, which is higher than your long-term average. This recent shift may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality presented in the most recent fiscal year.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ambrose's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Lansing hearing office
The Lansing hearing office serves you throughout Michigan and is part of a broader regional network. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 53%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Lansing Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lansing
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Lansing office, and 5 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 37% to 68% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Christopher Ambrose has an approval rate of 68% on record since 2016, which is at the top end of the 37% to 68% range for judges whose most recent office on record is Lansing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific expectations of this bench.
Yes, the data shows a dynamic trend. After an approval rate of 64% in 2016, the rate reached 83% in the most recent partial fiscal year of 2026. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific case.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, making the process random. An attorney can help you prepare your case regardless of which judge is assigned.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be questioned by the judge or a vocational expert about your ability to perform work. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your evidence.
The 68% approval rate for Christopher Ambrose since 2016 is a statistical observation of past decisions, not a guarantee of your outcome. Every case is unique, and the strength of your medical evidence is the most important factor. An attorney can help you evaluate your case's strengths and weaknesses.




