SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Christopher Ambrose

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,854 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While Ambrose has a 68% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period performance shows an 83% approval rate, which sits 30 points above the current 53% average for the Lansing hearing office. These figures are derived from 3,854 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 3,854
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Ambrose Lansing National
Approval rate 83% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 79%
Denials 17%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ambrose's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ambrose
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Ambrose, spanning from 2016 to 2026, shows a dynamic trend in approval outcomes. After a period of fluctuation between 2020 and 2023, the data indicates a recent upward trajectory in approvals. The latest reporting period shows an 83% approval rate, which is a shift from the lifetime average of 68%. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality presented during your hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ambrose's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lansing hearing office

The Lansing hearing office serves you throughout Michigan and the surrounding region. It is staffed by a bench of 9 judges on record, with a current office-wide latest-period approval rate of 53%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the specific medical and vocational evidence of your disability claim. See the Lansing hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Across the bench, lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 68%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions