SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Frederick Andreas

Last decided ClevelandSep 2025
Decisions 3,387since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 48% approval rate for Frederick Andreas reflects his entire record since 2016, which compares against the 17% to 70% range seen among other judges whose most recent office on record is the Cleveland hearing office. This broad range highlights why understanding the bench at your hearing office is important. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 3,387

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Andreas. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Andreas's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Andreas
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Frederick Andreas has shown shifts across his 3,387 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of relative stability in the late 2010s, the rate saw an increase in 2022 and 2023 before moderating in 2025. This fluctuation suggests that your recent decisions may be influenced by changes in case complexity or the specific evidence presented in your filings. The latest period reflects a departure from the higher approval rates seen in the 2023-2024 window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Andreas's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cleveland hearing office

The Cleveland hearing office serves you and other claimants across Ohio. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, reflecting a diverse bench with varying historical approval patterns. You should be prepared for a formal administrative process where evidence quality is paramount. You can see the Cleveland hearing office page for the full roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Cleveland

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Cleveland hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 17% to 70% on their since-2016 records. Because this variance exists across the bench, your preparation remains the most critical factor in your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions