SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Stacy Appleton

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2023
Decisions 1,347 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Stacy Appleton maintains a 44% lifetime approval rate, which sits within the 44% to 59% lifetime range observed among the bench at the Middlesboro hearing office. In the most recent reporting period, the 39% approval rate is 3 percentage points lower than the office-wide average of 42%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your individual hearing outcome.

Lifetime SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 1,347
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Appleton Middlesboro National
Approval rate 39% 42% 58%
Fully favorable 35%
Denials 61%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Appleton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Appleton
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2023, Stacy Appleton has issued 1,347 decisions on record. The yearly trend shows a peak in 2024 at 49% approval, followed by a decline to 39% in 2026. This recent shift indicates that the latest-period approval rate is currently lower than the lifetime average. These patterns often fluctuate based on the specific mix of medical conditions and evidence quality presented in a given year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Appleton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Middlesboro hearing office

The Middlesboro hearing office serves you and other claimants across Kentucky and the surrounding region. With 5 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 42%. When you appear here, be prepared for a thorough review of your medical documentation and work history. You can see the Middlesboro hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 5 judges on record at the Middlesboro hearing office since 2016, with 3 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this bench vary between 44% and 59% over their respective lifetimes. You can find more information on the Middlesboro hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions