SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paula F. Atchison

Last decided Phoenix DowntownSep 2024
Decisions 1,884since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 36% approval rate for Paula F. Atchison reflects her total decisions on record since 2017, which can be measured against the 32% to 78% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix Downtown. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges have historically decided cases. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 36%
Decisions on record 1,884

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Atchison. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Atchison's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Atchison
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Paula F. Atchison has shown a shift over the 1,884 decisions on record since 2017. After a period of decline between 2017 and 2021, the data shows an upward trend in recent years, with approval rates reaching 46% in 2023 and 46% in 2024. This pattern suggests that recent decisions have diverged from the earlier, lower averages. This trend may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Atchison's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Phoenix Downtown hearing office

Paula F. Atchison's most recent office on record is the Phoenix Downtown hearing office, which serves you if you are in Arizona. With 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, you can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Phoenix Downtown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix Downtown

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Phoenix Downtown hearing office. Approval rates among this bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 78% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions