SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kathleen Mucerino

Last decided Phoenix DowntownSep 2025
Decisions 3,164since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating an approval rate requires looking at the full scope of decisions on record since 2016. This data provides a statistical baseline based on 3,164 total decisions, offering a view of how this judge has historically approached disability claims. When comparing this to the broader bench at the Phoenix Downtown office, where approval rates for judges range from 32% to 78%, you can see where this judge stands relative to their peers. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 78%
Decisions on record 3,164

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Mucerino. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mucerino's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mucerino
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Kathleen Mucerino has fluctuated since 2016. After starting with an 89% approval rate in 2016 and 88% in 2017, the record shows a period of lower approval between 2018 and 2023. More recently, the data indicates a return to higher approval levels, with 89% in 2024 and 89% in 2025. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence presented in the courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mucerino's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Phoenix Downtown hearing office

The Phoenix Downtown hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the Arizona region. This office maintains a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your disability claim. You can see the Phoenix Downtown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix Downtown

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Phoenix Downtown office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 78% on their since-2016 records. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions