SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kenneth E. Ball

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 955 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at lifetime data to ensure a fair assessment. Kenneth E. Ball has a lifetime approval rate of 41% based on 955 total decisions. This sits within the broader office-wide lifetime range of 19% to 68% observed among the 12 judges on record at this location since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 955

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ball. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ball's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ball
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Kenneth E. Ball spans from 2016 to 2019, covering 955 total decisions. His approval rate has fluctuated over this period, showing a mix of annual percentages rather than a single linear trajectory. This variation is common in disability hearings where the complexity of medical evidence and case types can shift from year to year. The data reflects a career-long pattern of decision-making that provides a baseline for understanding his approach to disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ball's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orange hearing office

The Orange hearing office serves claimants throughout the California region. With 12 judges on record since 2016, the office manages a diverse caseload of disability applications. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Orange Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Kenneth E. Ball is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 19% to 68% over their respective lifetimes. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions