SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kenneth E. Ball

Last decided OrangeSep 2019
Decisions 955since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Kenneth E. Ball is calculated based on 955 decisions on record since 2016. This figure provides a baseline for understanding how this judge has historically evaluated disability claims. When compared to the 19% to 68% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Orange hearing office, this data helps clarify the statistical landscape of your hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 955

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ball. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ball's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ball
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Kenneth E. Ball has fluctuated across the 955 decisions on record since 2016. After an approval rate of 38% in 2016, the data shows 48% in 2017, 35% in 2018, and 50% in 2019. These shifts demonstrate that approval patterns can vary significantly from year to year. The most recent period reflects a departure from the earlier, lower-approval years, suggesting that your case mix or evidentiary standards may have evolved.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ball's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orange hearing office

The Orange hearing office serves you in California and is part of the broader SSA regional network. This office has a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence and vocational history. You can see the Orange hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orange

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orange hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 19% to 68% on their since-2016 records. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is important to prepare for the hearing process itself. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions