SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Angela Banks

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Bronx Hearing Office · 9 years on the bench · 12,584 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Banks?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both their long-term history and recent trends. Judge Banks maintains a lifetime approval rate of 43% based on 12,584 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, her approval rate reached 62%, which can be compared against the Bronx office average of 59% and the national average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Banks Bronx National
Approval rate 43% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 38%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Banks's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Banks
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 9 years on the bench, Judge Banks has demonstrated an upward trend in approval rates. Her decisions have become more favorable in recent years, reaching 66% in 2025. This shift suggests that her approach to case evaluation has evolved since her early tenure. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern of increased approvals compared to her career-long average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Banks's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Banks? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Bronx hearing office

The Bronx Hearing Office manages a high volume of SSDI cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 59%, reflecting the complex nature of the claims processed in this region. You can expect a rigorous review process focused on medical evidence and vocational capacity. You can visit the Bronx Hearing Office page for more information.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Bronx Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 43% to 68%. While these variations exist, the core requirements for proving disability remain consistent regardless of which judge presides over your hearing.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions