John R. Barker's most recent SSA record (September 2016) is at the Knoxville hearing office. Across the 97 decisions on record since 2016, 77% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 13% to 77% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the total volume of cases decided. With 97 decisions on record since 2016, the data provides a clear view of past activity at the Knoxville office. When comparing this to the broader bench, where approval rates range from 13% to 77%, it becomes evident that individual judicial patterns vary significantly. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Barker. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barker's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The data for John R. Barker covers 97 decisions on record since 2016. During the 2016 period, the judge maintained an approval rate of 77%. This pattern reflects the judge's activity during the recorded timeframe. Because case assignment is handled by a workload-balancing algorithm, the specific judge you are assigned is essentially random, making it important to understand the historical context of your assigned bench.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barker's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Knoxville hearing office
John R. Barker's most recent office on record is the Knoxville hearing office, as of September 2016. This office serves you and other claimants across the region. With 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the bench represents a variety of decision patterns. You can see the Knoxville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Knoxville
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 13% to 77% on their since-2016 records. Understanding the range of outcomes across the office helps you prepare for the variability inherent in the hearing process.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Judge Barker has an approval rate of 77% based on 97 decisions on record since 2016. This sits within the range of 13% to 77% observed among the 16 judges whose most recent office on record is Knoxville. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.
The data for John R. Barker shows an approval rate of 77% across 97 decisions on record since 2016. This figure represents the judge's activity during the recorded window. A qualified attorney can help you understand how these patterns might relate to your specific case.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because you cannot predict your judge, an attorney can help you prepare a strong case regardless of who is assigned.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where an ALJ reviews the evidence of your disability. You will likely answer questions about your medical history and work limitations. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your medical records for the hearing.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions, not a guarantee of a future outcome. While Judge Barker has a 77% approval rate on record since 2016, every case is unique and depends on the specific medical evidence provided. An attorney can help you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your claim.




