SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kevin R. Barnes

Last decided DaytonJul 2026
Decisions 4,261since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 68% approval rate for Kevin R. Barnes covers all decisions since 2016. In the most recent reporting period, this judge maintained a 77% approval rate, which is 10 percentage points higher than the Dayton office average of 67%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of cases, providing a stable statistical baseline. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 4,261
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Barnes Dayton National
Approval rate 77% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 74% — —
Denials 23% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barnes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Barnes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Kevin R. Barnes has shown notable shifts across the 4,261 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of decline between 2018 and 2021, the approval rate has trended upward, reaching 80% in 2025. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 77% approval rate, which remains well above the historical average. This recent pattern reflects a sustained period of higher allowance rates compared to the judge's record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barnes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dayton hearing office

The most recent office on record for Kevin R. Barnes is the Dayton hearing office, where he has recorded decisions through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 8 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 67%, providing a benchmark for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Dayton

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 5 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 46% to 69% based on records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions