SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mark Hockensmith

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Dayton Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 18,908 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both their long-term history and recent activity. Over 10 years on the bench, Mark Hockensmith has maintained a 52% approval rate across 18,908 lifetime decisions. This provides a statistical baseline when compared to the current office-wide approval rate of 66% and the national average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Hockensmith Dayton National
Approval rate 52% 70% 58%
Fully favorable 100%
Denials 0%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hockensmith's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hockensmith
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Your career path shows a distinct upward trend in approval rates over the last decade. Starting with a 39% approval rate in 2016, the data indicates a steady increase in favorable outcomes, reaching 72% in 2025. This recent performance represents a shift from your earlier years on the bench. These fluctuations often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or evolving evidentiary standards.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hockensmith's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Hockensmith? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dayton hearing office

The Special Review Cadre serves a unique function within the SSA, handling specialized caseloads that often require careful documentation. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a current approval rate of 66%. You should be prepared for a rigorous review of your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Special Review Cadre Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Special Review Cadre, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 32% to 63%. This variance highlights why understanding the specific tendencies of your assigned judge is a common part of your hearing preparation. The guidance for your case remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions