Janice E. Barnes-Williams maintains a 34% lifetime approval rate across 17,951 decisions. While these figures provide context, they are not predictions for your specific hearing. An experienced attorney can help you prepare your case to meet the evidentiary standards required by this judge.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. While the national average approval rate is 58%, Judge Barnes-Williams maintains a 34% lifetime approval rate. This data, drawn from 17,951 lifetime decisions, offers a look at how cases have been resolved in her courtroom over the last decade.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barnes-Williams's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over her 10 years on the bench, Judge Barnes-Williams has seen her approval rates fluctuate, moving from 32% in 2016 to a high of 45% in 2018, followed by a low of 23% in 2021. More recently, the data shows stabilization, with the approval rate holding at 36% from 2023 through 2025. These trends reflect the judge's long-term approach to the Social Security Act disability process.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barnes-Williams's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Barnes-Williams? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Kansas City hearing office
The Kansas City (Missouri) Hearing Office manages a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a latest approval rate of 54%. You can expect a formal process focused on the specific medical documentation provided in your file. You can visit the Kansas City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. Within the Kansas City Hearing Office, the 6 ALJs range from 28% to 61% in their lifetime approval rates. This variation highlights why you should focus on the strength of your own medical evidence regardless of your assignment.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
