James F. Barter has an approval rate of 56% across 2,760 decisions on record since January 2016. His most recent office on record is Mobile, where he concluded his recorded activity in September 2024. Because case assignment is random, your outcome depends on the specific evidence in your file. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for James F. Barter is based on 2,760 decisions recorded between January 2016 and September 2024. When evaluating this figure, consider the broader context of the Mobile hearing office, where the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this one have approval rates ranging from 28% to 81%. These figures provide a baseline for understanding how different judicial approaches impact case outcomes. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Barter. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, James F. Barter has maintained a consistent pattern of decision-making, with annual approval rates fluctuating between a low of 49% and a high of 62%. The data shows a steady volume of activity, with 2,760 total decisions on record. While the rate has seen minor yearly variations, the overall trend reflects a stable approach to evaluating disability claims. The most recent data from 2024 shows a 52% approval rate, which remains within the historical range observed throughout his time on record.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Mobile hearing office
James F. Barter's most recent office on record is the Mobile hearing office. This office is part of a network of hearing locations in Alabama that manage disability claims. With a bench of 18 judges, the office maintains a standard process for reviewing evidence and conducting hearings.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Mobile
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Mobile hearing office, there are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 28% to 81%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
James F. Barter has an approval rate of 56% on his record since 2016. This sits within the broader range of 28% to 81% observed among the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is Mobile. An attorney can help you understand how to present your medical evidence effectively for this specific bench.
The approval rate for James F. Barter has remained relatively steady over his 2,760 decisions on record. While annual rates have fluctuated between 49% and 62%, there is no long-term trend of significant decline or increase. If you are concerned about your hearing, a free case review can help you prepare. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because assignment is random, it is important to be prepared for any judge by having a strong, evidence-based case. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be asked questions about your daily limitations and work history. Having an attorney can help you navigate these questions and ensure your medical evidence is clearly presented. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. James F. Barter's 56% approval rate is just one data point among many factors, including the strength of your medical documentation. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.




