SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David R. Murchison

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Mobile Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,824 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Murchison?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Murchison's lifetime approval rate of 68% is measured against the current Mobile office average of 73% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant volume of 20,824 lifetime decisions, offering a clear view of his historical decision-making. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Murchison Mobile National
Approval rate 68% 73% 58%
Fully favorable 61%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Murchison's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Murchison
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Murchison has maintained a consistent approach to disability claims. His annual approval rates have fluctuated within a moderate range, peaking at 71% in 2018. The latest period shows a 64% approval rate, which aligns with his long-term career performance. This trend suggests a stable decision-making pattern that has persisted throughout his tenure in the Mobile office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Murchison's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Murchison? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mobile hearing office

The Mobile Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Alabama and the surrounding region. It is staffed by 6 ALJs who manage a high volume of disability cases. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 73%, reflecting the local landscape of disability adjudication. You can visit the Mobile Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Mobile Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 54% to 76%. While your assigned judge varies, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent. You can find more information on the Mobile Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions