SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Eric S. Basse

Last decided SeattleSep 2019
Decisions 1,242since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. Eric S. Basse has a 41% approval rate across 1,242 decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the 21% to 93% range observed among the 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 1,242

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Basse. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Basse's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Basse
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Eric S. Basse has a record of 1,242 decisions spanning from 2016 to 2019. His yearly approval rate was 39% in 2016, 46% in 2017, 41% in 2018, and 40% in 2019. This pattern suggests that the approach to evaluating evidence remained stable throughout the time on record at the Seattle office. These trends reflect historical data and do not indicate a shift in how your individual case is evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Basse's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seattle hearing office

Eric S. Basse's most recent office on record is the Seattle hearing office, where he recorded decisions through September 2019. This office serves the Washington region. You can expect a standard administrative process where the quality of your medical evidence is the primary factor in your decision. You can visit the Seattle hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle, with approval rates ranging from 21% to 93% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions