SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Peter J. Baum

Last decided RenoJul 2026
Decisions 4,150since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context on how a judge's decisions align with broader office, state, and national trends over the same 12-month window. Judge Baum's 70% approval rate is based on 402 decisions. These figures are compared against the Reno office, Nevada state, and national averages to show relative performance. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Baum Reno National
Approval rate 70% 68% 58%
Fully favorable 66% — —
Denials 30% — —
Decisions 402 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 4,150

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Baum's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Baum
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Judge Baum has issued 4,150 decisions on record, with an overall approval rate of 63%. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates rising to 72% in 2024 and 2025 before reaching 69% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. The most recent 12 months sit above the record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Baum's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Reno hearing office

The Reno hearing office is the most recent office on record for Judge Baum as of July 2026. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the office maintained an approval rate of 68%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Reno

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 3 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 59% to 70% over the 12-month window. There are 7 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 3 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Baum's 70%. No other judge in Nevada is within 5 points, so these come from SSA's San Francisco region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Baum and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions