SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Laurie A. Bedell

Last decided Atlanta NorthJul 2026
Decisions 3,885since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While you may note that Laurie A. Bedell maintains a 61% approval rate on her record since 2016, her latest-period performance shows a 62% approval rate, which sits 18 percentage points above the Atlanta North office average of 44% for that same period. These figures are derived from a volume of 3,885 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 3,885
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Bedell Atlanta North National
Approval rate 62% 44% 58%
Fully favorable 55% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bedell's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bedell
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Laurie A. Bedell has varied since 2016, moving from 56% in the initial year to 62% in the most recent period. This pattern is based on 3,885 total decisions on record. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, indicating that the approach to evaluating evidence has remained consistent over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bedell's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta North hearing office

Laurie A. Bedell's most recent office on record is the Atlanta North hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 24 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 44%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Atlanta North

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 24 judges whose most recent office on record is the Atlanta North office, and 6 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 24% to 94% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions