SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David Benedict

Last decided MetairieJul 2026
Decisions 4,481since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. David Benedict's 47% approval rate since 2016 provides a broad view of his decision history, while his latest-period rate of 52% offers a more current snapshot. When measured against the latest-period office rate of 54%, state rate of 55%, and national rate of 58%, these figures help contextualize the hearing environment.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 4,481
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Benedict Metairie National
Approval rate 52% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 48% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Benedict's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Benedict
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, David Benedict has issued 4,481 decisions. The yearly approval trend has fluctuated, showing a range from a low of 40% in 2018 to a high of 54% in 2022. The latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 52%, which sits slightly above his long-term average. This recent performance reflects a continuation of a steady pattern, though shifts in case mix or evidence quality often influence these annual variations.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Benedict's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Metairie hearing office

David Benedict's most recent office on record is the Metairie Hearing Office, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves you across Louisiana and is part of a broader regional network. With 9 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 54%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Metairie

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Metairie office, with 5 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench range from 24% to 54% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions