SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Karen Wiedemann

Last decided MetairieJul 2026
Decisions 3,793since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 54% approval rate since 2016 provides a long-term view, while latest-period data allows for a direct comparison against current office, state, and national benchmarks. With 3,793 decisions on record, the data offers a stable look at past outcomes. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 3,793
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Wiedemann Metairie National
Approval rate 57% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 43% — —
Denials 43% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wiedemann's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wiedemann
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, your judge's approval rate has varied. After initial fluctuations, the rate rose between 2022 and 2024, reaching 61% before recording 56% in 2026. The latest-period approval rate of 57% is 3 percentage points higher than the Metairie office's latest-period rate of 54%.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wiedemann's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Metairie hearing office

The Metairie hearing office is the most recent office on record for Karen Wiedemann as of July 2026. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 54%. Evidence quality remains the primary factor in your hearing outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Metairie

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Metairie office. Approval rates among this bench range from 24% to 54% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions