SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Eric V. Benham

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the San Diego Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 15,805 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Benham?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Benham's approval rate is calculated based on 15,805 lifetime decisions rendered over a decade on the bench. In the most recent reporting period, the judge maintained a 61% approval rate, which stands 4 percentage points above the current San Diego office average. Comparing these figures to the national average of 58% provides context for how this courtroom functions relative to others. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Benham San Diego National
Approval rate 61% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 51%
Denials 39%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Benham's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Benham
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Benham has navigated a variety of caseloads, with approval rates showing fluctuations between a high of 68% in 2017 and a low of 50% in 2023. The data indicates a recent return to higher approval levels, with a 68% rate in 2024 and a 61% rate in 2025. This pattern reflects a steady, experienced decision-making process.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Benham's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Benham? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Diego hearing office

The San Diego Hearing Office serves a large population in Southern California, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 57%. You can expect a professional environment where evidence quality and medical documentation are the primary drivers of the hearing outcome. You can see the San Diego Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the San Diego Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 38% to 68%. Because each judge manages their courtroom differently, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions