SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Dale Black-Pennington

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Albany Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 21,088 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Black-Pennington?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Black-Pennington has presided over 21,088 lifetime decisions during a 10-year tenure at the Albany Hearing Office. This docket provides a view of historical decision patterns when compared to the current office average of 67% and the national average of 58%. These figures serve as a baseline for understanding the judicial environment in Albany, though they do not predict your individual hearing outcome.

Metric Judge Black-Pennington Albany National
Approval rate 62% 67% 58%
Fully favorable 60%
Denials 32%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Black-Pennington's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Black-Pennington
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over the past decade, the approval rate has experienced fluctuations, notably dipping to 47% in 2022 before trending to 66% in 2025. The latest reporting period shows a 68% approval rate, which indicates a return to higher allowance levels compared to the lifetime average. This recent pattern reflects a shift in the current approach to evidence and case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Black-Pennington's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Black-Pennington? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albany hearing office

The Albany Hearing Office serves a large population across New York, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 67%, reflecting regional trends for SSDI claims. You should prepare for a thorough review of your medical records and vocational history. You can visit the Albany Hearing Office page for more information.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Albany Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 49% to 81%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is more important than the specific judge assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions