SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Dale Black-Pennington

Last decided AlbanyJul 2026
Decisions 3,628since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the 64% approval rate since 2016 provides a long-term view, recent performance is also telling. In the latest reporting period, the judge approved 72% of cases, which is 11 percentage points higher than the Albany office average of 61%. These figures are based on 3,628 decisions on record since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 64%
Decisions on record 3,628
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Black-Pennington Albany National
Approval rate 72% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 62% — —
Denials 28% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Black-Pennington's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Black-Pennington
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Dale Black-Pennington has fluctuated over the years, showing a peak in 2018 followed by a period of lower approval rates between 2020 and 2022. Since 2023, the trend has shifted upward, with the most recent fiscal year-to-date period showing a 72% approval rate. This latest period reflects a continuation of the recent upward trend, suggesting a divergence from the long-term average on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Black-Pennington's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albany hearing office

The Albany hearing office serves you and other claimants across New York. With 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 61%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary driver of your outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Albany

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assigned judge is essentially random. At the Albany hearing office, there are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, 8 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench range from 40% to 81% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions