SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul F. Kelly

On record 3,539 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Paul F. Kelly reflect a significant volume of cases, providing a stable statistical baseline for review. When comparing the latest reporting period, Kelly's 92% approval rate stands notably above the Albany office average of 61%, the New York state average of 62%, and the national average of 58%. These figures are based on 346 recent decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 81%
Decisions on record 3,539
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kelly Albany National
Approval rate 92% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 88%
Denials 8%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kelly's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kelly
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Paul F. Kelly has presided over 3,539 lifetime decisions. The yearly trend shows a period of decline between 2020 and 2022, followed by a consistent upward trajectory in approval rates from 2023 through 2026. The latest period's 92% approval rate represents a continuation of this recent growth. This pattern suggests that recent case outcomes have trended toward higher allowance rates compared to the judge's long-term historical average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kelly's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albany hearing office

The Albany hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 15 judges on record. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 61%, which provides context for the local administrative environment. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. See the Albany hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 15 judges on record at the Albany office since 2016, 8 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Across this bench, lifetime approval rates range from 41% to 81%. You can find more information on the office's overall performance on the Albany hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions