SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. NaKeisha Blount

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2017
Decisions 2,837 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing Judge Blount's performance requires looking at both her long-term record and recent activity. Her 61% lifetime approval rate sits within the broader 33% to 85% range observed across the Washington bench. In the most recent reporting period, she maintained an 84% approval rate, which is 21 percentage points higher than the office-wide average of 63%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for your case, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 2,837
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Blount Washington National
Approval rate 84% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 69%
Denials 16%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Blount's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Blount
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Judge Blount's record, spanning 2,837 lifetime decisions since 2017, shows an upward trend in recent years. After a period of lower approval rates between 2019 and 2021, the data indicates a rise in favorable outcomes. By 2026, her approval rate reached 84%, marking a shift from her earlier career averages. This trajectory reflects a change in the volume or nature of cases handled, representing a departure from her previous decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Blount's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington hearing office serves claimants throughout the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. As a busy hub in the region, it maintains a bench of 19 judges on record. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 63% for the latest period. You can see the Washington Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Washington hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Blount is effectively random. There are 19 judges on record at this office since 2016, 14 of whom reported in the latest SSA data period. Because approval rates across the office vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 85%, understanding the local bench is a standard part of case preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions