SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. NaKeisha Blount

Last decided WashingtonJul 2026
Decisions 2,837since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2017 is 61%, recent data shows a shift in decision patterns. The latest-period approval rate of 84% stands in contrast to the broader office, state, and national averages of 63%, 59%, and 58% respectively. These figures are based on a significant docket of 2,837 decisions on record since 2017. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 2,837
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Blount Washington National
Approval rate 84% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 69% — —
Denials 16% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Blount's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Blount
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for NaKeisha Blount has shown a notable upward trend in recent years. After a period of relative stability between 2018 and 2021, the approval rate began to climb, reaching 84% in the most recent fiscal year to date. This latest-period performance is higher than the 61% average observed across the 2,837 decisions on record since 2017. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Blount's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

NaKeisha Blount's most recent office on record is the Washington hearing office, which serves claimants in the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. This office maintains a bench of 33 judges, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 63%. You can see the Washington hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Washington

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 33 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 14 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates among this bench vary widely, ranging from 29% to 85% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions