SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Raghav Kotval

Last decided WashingtonJul 2026
Decisions 3,333since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table compares Raghav Kotval's approval rates against the Washington Hearing Office, state, and national benchmarks over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. These figures provide a statistical view of how this bench operates, based on the 248 decisions Raghav Kotval issued during this period. The data reflects a significant volume of cases, offering a look at past decision patterns.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kotval Washington National
Approval rate 53% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 36% — —
Denials 47% — —
Decisions 248 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 3,333

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kotval's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kotval
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Raghav Kotval has issued 3,333 decisions. The approval rate has fluctuated over this period, with yearly performance ranging from 47% to 56%. While the rate reached 56% in 2024, the most recent 12 months sit near the long-term average. The data shows a consistent pattern of decisions over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kotval's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington Hearing Office serves the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. This office has a bench of 33 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the office maintained a 63% approval rate. You can expect a standard administrative process at this location.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Washington

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Washington Hearing Office, the 14 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file range from 32% to 87% on their 12-month approval rates. There are 33 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 14 of them deciding cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Kotval's 53%. Three of them last decided cases in District of Columbia. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Philadelphia region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Kotval and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions