SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edward Bowling

Last decided KnoxvilleSep 2021
Decisions 1,749since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. The 49% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 13% to 77% range observed among the 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Knoxville hearing office. With 1,749 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 1,749

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Bowling. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Bowling's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Bowling
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Edward Bowling has fluctuated across the 1,749 decisions on record since 2016. The yearly trend shows a period of stability followed by an increase in the final year of the record. Because the SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, these variations are common. The recent data reflects a departure from the earlier, more steady pattern, which may be influenced by changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Bowling's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Knoxville hearing office

Edward Bowling's most recent office on record is the Knoxville hearing office, with activity recorded through September 2021. This office serves you and other claimants across the region and is part of a bench consisting of 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Knoxville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Knoxville

The SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Knoxville hearing office, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 13% to 77%. This variance highlights why preparing your evidence thoroughly is essential regardless of your specific assignment. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions