SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kimberly Boyce

Last decided SeattleSep 2020
Decisions 1,438since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The most relevant comparison for your hearing is the range of outcomes among the 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Seattle hearing office. These judges show a wide variance in their since-2016 records, ranging from 21% to 93%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 42%
Decisions on record 1,438

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Boyce. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Boyce's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Boyce
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Kimberly Boyce has shown a gradual upward trend. Starting at 39% in 2016, the rate dipped slightly in 2017 before climbing to 48% by 2020. This pattern across 1,438 decisions on record indicates a shift in outcomes over the four-year window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Boyce's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seattle hearing office

Kimberly Boyce's most recent office on record is the Seattle hearing office, with decisions there through September 2020. This office serves you and other claimants across the region and is staffed by a bench of 22 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can see the Seattle hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Seattle

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is the Seattle hearing office, and their approval rates vary significantly from 21% to 93%. Because this assignment process is automated, you have no control over which judge hears your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions