SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Cynthia W. Brown

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Birmingham Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,728 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Brown?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Brown maintains a lifetime approval rate of 56%, which we evaluate against the Birmingham Hearing Office latest rate of 52% and the national average of 58%. With 20,728 lifetime decisions on record, this data offers a look at past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Brown Birmingham National
Approval rate 56% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 46%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Brown's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Brown
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Brown has navigated a shifting landscape of case volumes and approval patterns. While the rate reached 66% in 2016, recent years have seen the approval rate stabilize near 54%. The latest reporting period shows a 46% fully-favorable rate. The current data suggests a consistent approach to case evaluation that aligns with the broader office environment.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Brown's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Brown? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

The Birmingham Hearing Office serves a large population across Alabama, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 6 judges currently on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 52%. You should expect a formal process focused on the medical documentation supporting your claim. You can view the full ALJ roster on the Birmingham Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the Birmingham Hearing Office, the bench includes 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 38% to 77%. Because your case is assigned randomly, you may be scheduled before any of these officials. You can find more information on the Birmingham Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions