SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. George W. Merchant

Last decided BirminghamJul 2026
Decisions 4,160since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to compare the judge's performance against the broader bench. While your judge's approval rate on record since 2016 is 38%, the range for all judges at the Birmingham office is 28% to 85%. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 35% approval rate sits 14 points below the office average of 49%. These figures are based on thousands of decisions, providing a stable, data-driven perspective.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 4,160
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Merchant Birmingham National
Approval rate 35% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 30% — —
Denials 65% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Merchant's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Merchant
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for George W. Merchant has fluctuated over the last decade. After reaching 44% in 2020, the rate saw a decline to 30% in 2022 before stabilizing near 39% in 2025. The latest period, at 35%, remains consistent with the judge's long-term average. This pattern suggests that while individual outcomes vary, the judge's approach to evidence and testimony has maintained a relatively steady trajectory over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Merchant's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

George W. Merchant's most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across Alabama, managing a diverse caseload with a bench of 23 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 49%, reflecting the local standards for evaluating disability claims.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, with 7 of them having decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Because approval rates across this bench vary widely from 28% to 85%, understanding the broader office environment is useful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions