SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. George W. Merchant

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,160 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time periods to ensure accuracy. While George W. Merchant has a lifetime approval rate of 38%, his latest-period rate is 35%, which sits 14 points below the Birmingham office's latest-period average of 49%. These figures are derived from a large docket of 4,160 lifetime decisions, providing a stable view of his decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 38%
Decisions on record 4,160
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Merchant Birmingham National
Approval rate 35% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 30%
Denials 65%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Merchant's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Merchant
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, George W. Merchant has maintained a varied approval pattern. His yearly approval rates have fluctuated, reaching a high of 44% in 2020 and a low of 30% in 2022. The most recent data shows a 35% approval rate, which is consistent with the lower end of his historical performance. This trend suggests that his recent decisions reflect a steady approach to the evidence presented in your courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Merchant's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

The Birmingham hearing office serves you throughout Alabama and the surrounding region. With a bench of 23 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 49%. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Birmingham Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. There are 23 judges on record at the Birmingham office since 2016, with 7 currently reporting data in the latest period. These judges show a wide range of lifetime approval rates, spanning from 28% to 85%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions