SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Amy Budney

Last decided ClevelandJul 2026
Decisions 3,749since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating a judge's record, it is useful to compare their performance against the broader bench. Judges whose most recent office on record is Cleveland show an approval-rate range between 17% and 70% since 2016. In the most recent reporting period, Amy Budney maintained an approval rate of 61%, which sits 10 percentage points above the 51% average for the Cleveland office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,749
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Budney Cleveland National
Approval rate 61% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 42% — —
Denials 39% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Budney's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Budney
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Amy Budney has issued 3,749 decisions. The yearly trend shows a fluctuating pattern, starting at 49% in 2016, reaching a high of 68% in 2025, and currently sitting at 61% for the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent figure remains consistent with the long-term average. The data indicates that while approval rates can shift year-to-year, recent activity reflects a continuation of an established decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Budney's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cleveland hearing office

Amy Budney's most recent office on record is the Cleveland hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you across northern Ohio and maintains an office-wide approval rate of 51% for the latest reporting period. With a bench of 22 judges on record, the office handles a high volume of disability claims.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Cleveland

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 22 judges whose most recent office on record is Cleveland, and 11 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 17% to 70%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions