SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert M. Butler

On record 1,718 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Robert M. Butler stands at 79% based on his total record of 1,718 decisions. When compared to the broader bench at the NHC St Louis hearing office, where lifetime approval rates range from 41% to 79%, his record sits at the upper end of the local spectrum. These figures rely on a substantial volume of cases to ensure statistical stability. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 79%
Decisions on record 1,718

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Butler. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Butler's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Butler
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision record for Robert M. Butler, spanning from 2016 to 2020, shows a consistent pattern of approvals. After starting with a 67% approval rate in 2016, the trend moved upward, reaching a peak of 86% in 2019 before stabilizing at 81% in 2020. This trajectory suggests a steady approach to evaluating your disability claim over the course of his recorded tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Butler's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC St Louis hearing office

The NHC St Louis hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout Missouri and the surrounding region. This office maintains a diverse bench of 10 judges on record, ensuring that cases are processed through a standardized administrative process. You can expect a formal hearing environment focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the NHC St Louis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The NHC St Louis hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at this office since 2016, with lifetime approval rates varying widely from 41% to 79%. Because you cannot choose your judge, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation. You can find more information on the NHC St Louis hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions